JSFiddle - React, Tailwind, and code Playground
by Rahul Sharma
HTML
<div id ="article-detail-desc" >
<p>
A storm of moral outrage over tax avoiders is brewing in European capitals making fiscal and welfare cuts to ward off recession. To be clear, there is a difference between tax avoidance also known as tax mitigation - a legal manipulation of the system via loopholes - and tax evasion whereby tax payers fraudulently misrepresent their income. The little guy pays a larger percentage of tax than the mega-rich and is subject to being hassled by tax authorities whereas multi-national corporations are able to afford the services of top notch tax accountants and set-up complex shell companies. I’m one example. When I was self-employed in my early 20s, I received a visit from a grim-faced Inland Revenue Inspector who declined my offer of a cup of tea. “I’ve come to collect an outstanding amount of income tax,” he told me. “How much?” I asked with trepidation, thinking of my diminutive bank account. “£6.20” (AED 36.70), he told me with a straight face, which was less than the cost of his time and transport.</p>
<p>
Currently under fire in Britain are Starbucks, Google and Amazon, accused by the chairwoman of the House of Commons Parliamentary committee as “ripping off taxpayers” by “using structures and exploiting current tax legislation to move offshore profits that are clearly generated from economic activity in the UK.” For instance, Amazon’s 2011 turnover was reported as £207 million (AED 1.2 billion) but it was only required to pay £1.8 million (AED 10.65 million) in tax. Starbucks’ sales were in the region of £3.1 billion (AED 18.3 billion) over the last 13 years out of which just £8.6 million (AED 50.9 million) ended-up in the Treasury’s coffers.</p>
<p>
Google posted £2.5 billion (AED 14.8 billion) UK sales last year and paid just £3.4 million (AED 20.1 million). The committee has also blasted...
CSS
p {margin:10px;}
#ArticleContent { width:500px; height:100%; text-align:justify; background-color:#fff;}
.ad-keyword-selected
{
color:#990044;
text-decoration:none;
}
.ui-tooltip, .arrow:after {
background: #fff;
border: 1px solid #f5f5f5;
}
.ui-tooltip {
padding: 10px 20px;
color: #333333;
border-radius: 10px;
font: normal 12px Georgia,"Times New Roman",Times,serif;
text-transform: uppercase;
box-shadow: 0 0 3px #333333;
}
.arrow {
width: 70px;
height: 16px;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -35px;
bottom: -16px;
}
.arrow.top {
top: -16px;
bottom: auto;
}
.arrow.left {
left: 20%;
}
.arrow:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
left: 20px;
top: -20px;
width: 25px;
height: 25px;
box-shadow: 6px 5px 9px -9px black;
-webkit-transform: rotate(45deg);
-moz-transform: rotate(45deg);
-ms-transform: rotate(45deg);
-o-transform: rotate(45deg);
tranform: rotate(45deg);
}
.arrow.top:after {
bottom: -20px;
top: auto;
}
JavaScript
function HighlightKeywords(keywords)
{
var el = $("#article-detail-desc");
var language = "en-US";
var pid = 100;
var issueID = 10;
$(keywords).each(function()
{
var pattern = new RegExp("("+this+")", ["gi"]);
var rs = "<a class='ad-keyword-selected' href='en/search.aspx?Language="+language+"&PageId="+pid+"&issue="+issueID+"&search=$1' title='Seach website for: $1'><span style='color:#990044; tex-decoration:none;'>$1</span></a>";
el.html(el.html().replace(pattern, rs));
});
}
HighlightKeywords(["David Cameron","mega-rich","corporations","House of Commons","Amazon","Google","Starbucks","UK","US","tax havens","Singapore","Hong Kong","Dubai","New Jersey"]);
//function for popup tool tip
$(function() {
$("#article-detail-desc").tooltip({
position: {
my: "center bottom-20",
at: "center top",
using: function( position, feedback ) {
$( this ).css( position );
$( "<div>" )
.addClass( "arrow" )
.addClass( feedback.vertical )
.addClass( feedback.horizontal )
.appendTo( this );
}
}
});
});